Showing posts with label riots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label riots. Show all posts

Thursday, August 18, 2011

England riots: couple jailed for four years in order to use Facebook to encourage disorder

Perry Sutcliffe-KeenanPerry Sutcliffe-Keenan, one of two men jailed for four years at Chester crown court for using Facebook to encourage disorder, although their actions do not cause disturbances

Two men have been jailed for four years in order to use Facebook to encourage disorder.

Jordan Blackshaw, 20, from Marston near Northwich, and Perry Sutcliffe-Keenan, 22, from Warrington, appeared in Chester crown court on Tuesday. They were arrested last week after the events of violent disorder in London and other cities throughout the United Kingdom.

None of their Facebook posts resulted in a riot-related event.

During sentencing, the recorder of Chester, Elgin Edwards, praised Cheshire police quick actions and said he hoped the sentences would act as a deterrent to others.

Assistant Chief Constable Phil Thompson said: "if we cast our minds back a few days to last week and will remember the way in which the technology was used to spread the incitement and bring people together to commit acts of criminality, it is easy to understand the four year sentences were handed down in Court today.

"In Cheshire, we quickly recognised the impact of the situation of our society and the way in which social media was used to promote and encourage conduct that would strike fear in the heart of our society.

"From offset, Cheshire constabulary adopted a robust policing approach by means of the information that originates in your organization to move quickly and effectively against any person whose conduct was likely to encourage criminality. Officers took swift action against those people who have used Facebook and other social media sites to incite disorder.

"The sentences passed today recognize how technology can be abused to encourage criminal activity, and send a strong message to potential troublemakers on the extent to which ordinary people value safety and order in their lives and their communities. Anyone who seeks to undermine, will face the full force of law. "


View the original article here

Tech weekly per podcast: Google-Motorola, riots and social media,

Join Aleks Krotoski and Juliette Garside a zipped version of the Tech Weekly. This week, politics, social media: what role should the British Government has in regulating our access to services such as Facebook BlackBerry , Messenger and Twitter? Author Jeff Jarvis weighs debate and finds that there is currently a demonisation of technology.

Also, the Search giant Google has moved to mobile manufacturing business: blogger stasis Bielinis broke news of Monday's Motorola mobility deal – worth $ 12.5bn – back in June. We find out what is it for Google, and how mobile ecosystem will settle after that bombing.

The British Government has announced the next phase in the high-speed broadband plans – corporate BT partner has promised to bid on some of the £ 530 million in grants connected to out-of-reach rural communities for fast connection. We hear from Bill Murphy, MD for next generation access at BT about the details of its plans, and where it intends to invest.

Finally, what is in store for protracted gamesFifa brand? Keith Stuart speaks with Andrew Wilson, senior VP of worldwide development at EA Sports about its plans for cross-platform entertainment.

Don't forget to ...

• Comment below
• Mail tech@guardian.co.ukproducer
• Get our Twitter feed to program updates or follow our Twitter list
• Like our Facebook page
• See our photos on Flickr/post your tech pics


View the original article here

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Police access to BlackBerry messages to thwart planned riots

Police thwarted planned riots with the help of intelligence garnered from BlackBerry messagesPolice thwarted planned riots by using intelligence gained from BlackBerry messages. Photo: Amer Hilabi/AFP/Getty Images

Scotland Yard stopped attacks by rioters on sites across London of hours before they had been carried out in accordance with the regime to "break into" encrypted social messaging sites, it has emerged.

Attacks on the OLYMPICS, the shops in Oxford Circus and the two Westfield shopping centre, in the East and West London, had been plotted by BlackBerry using Messenger (BBM).

Detectives made breakthrough shortly before the planned attack after scouring pastes mobile phones of people who had been arrested during the riots.

It gave them access to messaging, scheduling, riots and looting, and bouncing around the service heavily encrypted BBM.

But it also gave met other information, which means they were able to use details experiences from the confiscated phones to give officers '' live time monitoring "of the BBM and also Twitter.

By last Monday afternoon, they were able to monitor BlackBerry messaging and send extra officers to disrupt the planned attack, which may have heightened the sense of threat felt by Londonernes.

This Tuesday, police , revealed they had been considering switching away from social messaging sites including BBM and Twitter.

Testified before the MPs on the Committee on Internal Affairs, the acting Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Tim Godwin, said police discovered they do not have legal powers to do it, adding: "we found searching the legal authority to extinguish it. Legality is dubious, very dubious. "

He said that as well as social messaging sites are used to plan the riots, they were a useful "intelligence asset" for the police, who were able to monitor them.

Last Monday, police chiefs sent officers to thwart the planned attack on the Olympic site at Stratford, east London. Shops in the area closed even after the "intelligence" produced by social messaging sites of conspiracies to riot.

He said police did not "at this point in time" ask the Government for new powers to turn off social messaging sites during outbreaks of extreme disarray.

This week, need the guardian revealed that the Government had drafted in MI5 Security Service and the eaves dropping Centre at GCHQ joins the hunt for them with social messaging to plot riots and work out how BlackBerry messaging could be "broken" in the future, and in real time if.

Godwin told MPs begin their investigation of the riots, David Cameron had been wrong to tell Commons last week that his officers had been too cautious when confronted with rioters and looters.

Confirming that he would apply for the next Commissioner of the met, he said: "I do not believe the men and women of met was hesitant, which is an accusation that has been directed to us."

Sir Hugh Orde, President of the Association of Chief Police officers, said in his evidence that the police had no outrageous riots would break out.

"We are so fundamentally different in my assessment, was almost non-existent pre-intelligence. This was a spontaneous rather than organized, "he said.

Police Chiefs once again rejected the Government's allegations, it had quelled the unrest by ordering a huge wave of officers on the street.

Godwin said he made the decision last Monday evening after it became clear officers were still being buffer overrun, as riots hit 22 of the 32 boroughs in London. Market economy treatment, Britain's largest force, needed help from 30 other forces.

Orde told the politicians they legally had no role in the creation tactics. "If politicians want to make tactical decisions, they must take responsibility and change the law for that to happen," he added.


View the original article here

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

England riots: where it happened and where suspects fine | Associated With

Rioters commute in for looting? It is a theory being investigated by police and politicians. And as hundreds of suspected looters are pushed through the magistrates courts, what information it tells us about how the events of the last nights in early August exploded?

An analysis of one day of hearings by he the BBC last week found 70% of these are accused of riot-related crimes had travelled from outside their territory. Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has called it "riot tourism", and it is a part of the argument used by those who wish to withdraw the benefits and Council housing from those accused of riots, even in a different town.

Also said Housing Minister Grant shapps :

If a person has completed these riots, then circumstance have you committed it in direct neighborhood or elsewhere should be countable

Download and zoom around the cards using Prezi

We have analyzed over 300 entries of people on riot-related charges English magistrates courts to see how people are fine and where the riots took place. The maps above Show-for the big events that took place in August 2011-the power in each city.

This is not a complete record and is of the alleged cases, some not pleaded guilty. The other caveat is that it does not show what event each of the suspects are alleged to be a part of. But it shows how people were arrested and charged in the days after the riots came from everywhere in the cities affected.

The effect is particularly pronounced in Manchester, where suspects have been in court from the suburbs to the city. In Londonis there a similar effect, although it seems to show people traveled, but not so much.

It tells us something-what do you think?

• Contact us data@guardian.co.ukon

Interactive map riot events
Riot events listed
Riots linked to poverty

• List of riot-related cases to court magistrates

Data journalism and data visualisations from the guardian

Search World Government data with our gateway

Search world global development data with our gateway

Flickr please post your visualisations and mash-ups on our Flickr group
• Contact us data@guardian.co.ukon

Get A-Z of data
More on the datastore

Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook


View the original article here

Monday, August 15, 2011

Open door: riots, racial, and reporting

Some stories timber down the track in months, announcing their approach with bells, whistles and a final ear-bride fanfare: the Olympic Games in 2012 is a case. Other displays come out of nowhere, catch all — or nearly all — by surprise, with devastating consequences. Mark Duggan, 29, died on Wednesday 4 August at Tottenham Hale in North-East London, in the hands of a police firearms specialist, is in the second category.

He is not the first person to be shot by police during arrest. And his death was not even power lines news in two days. A group including his fiancée and community workers, went to Tottenham police station on Friday 6 August, to try to find out more about what had happened. Later that night, youths tried to break through police lines to get to the police station.

The unrest in the area, Tottenham scattered across the country and over guardian pages of its site and throughout last week. Journalists fought in extremely hazardous circumstances to get as many and as accurate witness reports as possible into the guardian in print and online. I think in general they have achieved a very high standard of accuracy and fairness of the four nights of riots (although we should have made clearer, before that they were English riots rather than UK-wide).

However, and probably inevitable in such a highly charged situation, where language is a problem in itself, has been criticised the guardian for some aspects of its reporting. Terminology is crucial, and one lapse from the Guardian style guide arose when the term Afro-Caribbean was used instead for African Caribbean.

Any description of the make-up of the groups on the streets – a crucial for Justice in reporting and understand what was happening in fact exercise — was fraught with difficulties. A report in Monday's paper of the scenes in Tottenham and the surrounding area contained these statements in a 1,800 word report: "make-up of the rioters were racially mixed. Most were men or boys, some apparently as young as 10. But families and other local bebøre, including some from Tottenhams Hasidic Jewish community, also gathered to watch and jeer at the police. "

More than a dozen e-mails were received by the readers editor's office, including one from the Executive Director of the Board of deputies of British Jews. The complaint was that we had unfairly singled out one ethnic group, the Hasidic Jewish community.

In consultation with Paul Lewis, a reporter, who covered rioting in London and other cities, was the phrase extended within 24 hours to give details of the other groups on the streets at night. Report's did not attempt to blame the riots on the Hasidic community. He was on the scene and try to make it clear that representatives of part of the multicultural society in the region – Hasidic Jews – were on the streets. He tries to paint a picture of what was the streets like at this point. He was careful not to say that he saw members of the Hasidic community unrest, which he did not. From the Guardian coverage by Mark Duggan death as a whole, it was clear that many of them in the crowd were from a multicultural background. But read in isolation, the original story did not make clear enough – and we're sorry.

Online social networks played an important role – different reasons — to journalists and rioters. But the quantity of reports can be confusing. Paul Lewis, who had after riots every one of the four days and nights, so an event on the evening of Tuesday 9 August in Enfield, where a small group of white men chased at least one black man through the streets. He heard men yell that they wanted to get "black" and "pack ice" and tweeted this event as part of his coverage.

However, there were other peaceful groups of white males and other multicultural groups on the streets the night guarding the properties, and they could not see what Lewis saw. The incidents were confused. A complainant to guardian trøde report's deliberately stirring problems. I have talked with the reporter and he was with a colleague, who confirms his account for the first event. The guardian also has some reader video films that support their eye-witness accounts. But the speed of Twitter and anger by them on the street have made this difficult to disentangle.


View the original article here

Sunday, August 14, 2011

David Starkey of the riots: "white black"-video

Historian David Starkey has provoked a storm of criticism by saying that ' White has been black ' during a discussion on BBC2's he on UK riots. Starkey spoke about ' a profound cultural change ', and said he had Jesus Gospel Enoch Powell's rivers of blood speech. An outcry on Twitter began with Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn asks BBC: ' why was racist analysis of Starkey controversial? What exactly are you trying to prove? '

View the original article here

UK riots: nine ways to use Twitter responsibly

Twitter internet website homepageTwitter has been flooded with reputation, as well as useful information. Photo: Iain Masterton/Alamy

Riots spread across London and the rest of the country in the last few days, Twitter has been flooded with rumours, exaggeration and outright untruth with people spreading useful news.

Here are a few simple pointers on how to get the most out of Twitter as news breaks — and to avoid scaring people in the process.

Unless you can see it happening, not Tweet about it.

It can be extremely tempting to convey vital information – for example – Primark in Tooting has burned to the ground. It is an extremely sad tanks for passionate supporters the Leopard-Print leggings and cheap handbags in south London, so it is not surprising that the news spread like wildfire on Monday evening.

The problem was that it was completely untrue and served only to spread fear among the people who live there. In this case, there was a pall of smoke hanging over the high street, and people who could not see the source put two and two together and came up with 47 – and then their friends helpfully made matters worse by retweeting it.

Remember that some people make jokes.

This is how Tooting Primark story began: with people doing silly rhyming jokes about steal in Ealing and looting in Tooting. The problem is that only one of these things were actually happening at the time, but people latched onto the phrase as if it were true. If you see this kind of casual references, bear in mind they might just have to make a punchline. Again, if you are not certain, ask.

Remember to be afraid of something is not the same as knowing that it will happen.

A lot of the most virulent rumors Monday evening in London came through people tweeting things like, ' Oh God, I am afraid they will come to Luton-Brighton/Scunthorpe. " Somehow, in the course of a few tweets, change these thoughts in others say "I am hearing rumours about them coming to Luton-Brighton/Scunthorpe!" and the whole affair snowballed from there. It is quite understandable that people are afraid of what might happen, and wants to talk about it – but don't assume this means that looters devoted descending at Scunthorpe.

If you can see rumors, ask them directly.

If you retweet a rumor, even if you're looking for confirmation that it is not true, what you can do is scare set a whole new people not knew that they might be in danger from, say, a giant fire-breathing Deborah Meaden rampaging against Westminster.

Rather than passing it, and thus spreading fear, try tweeting people directly to ask if they know something is settled, or whether they might have got a touch confused between the new Dragon The and rolling riot coverage. Try to get direct confirmation from someone who has actually seen Deborah in all her glory.

Get verification.

Is this picture really of Birmingham, or is it of London? Have the local police said something about the riots in Scunthorpe? Has anyone got any pictures of giant Deborah Meaden? If not, how can you tell what is true?

If you see something you don't know really, try to correct it.

Some people, for reasons unknown, enjoy tweeting random untruths composed entirely in capital letters on the Shepherd's Bush is on fire. Some of these people are reacting well when asked politely to pull back their opinions, while others may respond with a frantic barrage of random abuse easily for no apparent reason.

People according to what is going on in their neighbouring countries will however understand you are trying to get the truth out — regardless of whether it is through the questioning of any person or tweeting images of bits Shepherds Bush, which is absolutely not on fire. Try adding the connection to your tweets – give people good reasons to believe you more than the other person.

If you are tweeting about things you can see, be specific.

Remember: If you can see it, and you have the means to publish information about it, it makes you a de facto reporter. So be responsible with their power. Be specific about where you are and what you can see.

Resist the urge to exaggerate or take on things you can't see-stick to what is in front of you if you can Tweet pictures, do – but bo safely and do not take unnecessary risks to do. You is also important to lose.

Follow the people you trust to be accurate.

Many local police forces have uses Twitter to distribute information and field rumours, and it is worth finding your and after them, there are a lot of journalists on Twitter – national newspaper tweetere like our Guardian team, including Paul Lewis , as well as mustafa khaliliand dozens of journalists from other papers, BBC, Sky and ITN News team.

There are also local journalists from the local papers, freelancers and all kinds of people are bound to ensure the dissemination of the truth and do not spread rumors. Each community has a few cultural life that makes this work. Find yours and help them.

This Twitter list of trusted journalists covering the riots, produced by Sky News producer Neal Mann, aka @ field producer, is also useful.

If you've been out looting and unrest, please Tweet about it.

Following this advice will help police the job much easier.


View the original article here

Saturday, August 13, 2011

UK riots: Paul Lewiss five days travel

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

For me, it started when I saw a man walking through an estate in Tottenham, north London, carrying a flatscreen TV.

It was 10.30pm last Saturday, and I was checking out reports of fires and clashes with police.

Riot police had formed a cordon around the south end of the road. It was like an artificial boundary, separating a quiet north London suburb from another, unrecognisable world.

Tottenham, the scene of a peaceful protest against the police shooting of Mark Duggan five hours earlier, had erupted into a riot.

It dawned on me in stages. Two older women hurried past with a suitcase. Then other men and women came running past, looking terrified.

I turned the corner onto the High Road, and found a police car ablaze, and teenagers, some who looked as young as 10, ransacking a music shop. Inside the next store, a travel agent, a desk was on fire.

It had taken 48 hours and a host of unanswered questions for the ripples of anger from the fatal shooting of Duggan, 29, to lead to civil unrest in Tottenham.

From that point on the contagion would spread with breathtaking speed, igniting riots and disorder in towns and cities across England.

By the end of the week, five people would have been left dead from the disturbances, and more than 1,500 arrested.

Tottenham was the start of a five-day journey in which my colleague, film-maker Mustafa Khalili and I, would record similar destruction in dozens of suburbs in places as varied as west London and Gloucester, in what felt like a country at war with itself.

The first portal for communicating what we saw was Twitter. It enabled us to deliver real-time reports from the scene, but more importantly enabled other users of Twitter to provide constant feedback and directions to troublespots. While journalists covering previous riots would chase ambulances to find the frontline, we followed what people on social media told us. By the end of the week, I had accumulated 35,000 new Twitter followers.

At 1.30am on Sunday, I had returned home assuming the rioting had died out. Then someone sent me a picture of an ALDI supermarket on fire. The BBC and Sky had been ordered out because it was too dangerous, with reports emerging of trouble in Wood Green, two miles west of Tottenham. Around 2.30am I decided to head back, this time wearing a hoodie and riding a bicycle; to blend in, and because no one could have got through in a car. On the approach, roads were blocked with burning barricades. Mostly the streets were filled with bystanders. But in places there were men, some in balaclavas, guarding the streets as shops were looted.

A minicab was driving erratically down a quiet residential street. As it passed, a wide-eyed teenager stared out. He looked 14.

The looting on nearby Wood Green's main high street was brazen, and was still going on around sunrise at 5.30am. That Sunday afternoon I toured Tottenham Hale retail park. I found people peering into the smashed stores: Boots, JD Sports, O2, Currys, Argos, Orange, PC World and Comet.

Everyone was asking the same questions. How had police lost control? And was it going to happen again?

It was just before 9pm on Sunday when I saw hundreds of youths head to the G Mantella jewellery store on Enfield high street, six miles north of where the disturbances had begun.

Police had earlier warned residents that the suburb would be on the "frontline" that night and filled a Tesco car park full of police horses in anticipation.

By late afternoon, a police car had been attacked in Enfield, and a handful of shop windows broken. The attack on the jewellers was over in seconds.

Minutes later I was stood on a side-street, where young men were knocking down garden walls and collecting bricks to hurl at police. I used my bottled water to wash the bleeding hand of a boy who looked about 12.

This was the opening salvo in what would turn into the second night of disturbances. But Sunday was not, as was reported, a night of worsening riots. The disorder in Enfield, Hackney and Brixton was smaller in scale than the previous night, and felt like organised theft.

I was shown the BBM – Blackberry Messenger – broadcast circulated hours earlier, announcing Enfield as a target.

It called on everyone in nearby boroughs to "start leaving ur yards" and bring "bags trollys, cars vans, hammers the lott!!!". It warned against passing the message to "snitch boys" (police informants) and said the aim was to "just rob everything".

There was one line – "dead the fires though"; that seemed to discourage arson.

I saw only one fire that night, as I followed in the wake of the looting, through debris-strewn streets.

In Ponders End, a suburb east of Enfield, Tesco workers told me how dozens of youths had made away with TVs and alcohol. "The windows smashed and they just came pouring in from all four sides," one said.

Minutes later I came across a group of teenagers huddled by Edmonton Working Men's Conservative Club. Most of them were girls, and in a state of panic. I saw they were holding a topless boy, who looked about 17. "He's been stabbed," one said.

As soon as he was in the ambulance, his friends fled, telling police they did not want to talk to "Feds" (slang for the police). One screamed: "We hate you." Another shouted: "You're the reason this is happening."

Three teenagers cycling past stopped to look at the blood-splattered pavement. One looked at me and said: "Bruv, you the man from Twitter?"

He said he had been following updates from journalists about the riots, and told us to head to Edmonton Green, where there was a plan to attack shops at midnight.

As it turned out, lines of riot police protecting shop fronts appeared to have thwarted that plan. At 4am, as I drove home along Hackney's Kingsland Road, the scene of minor looting hours earlier, I saw pavements still filled with police.

They had rows of young men and women lined-up against the walls, queuing for their stop and search.

Twelve hours later, it was reportedly a stop and search about half a mile away, on Mare Street, that ignited more violent scenes in Hackney.

In truth, it was more likely the "copycat" contagion that would make Monday night the worst by far for unrest in London, with disorder spreading to cities such as Birmingham, Nottingham, Liverpool and Bristol.

I arrived at Hackney's Pembury Estate around 6pm, following the large plumes of smoke that could be seen from most of east London, to see a white van which had been ram-raided into a wall and set on fire.

Next a motorbike was turned on its side and set alight, followed by two cars; each time the crowd waited nervously for the fuel tank to explode, and then added fuel to the burning barricades that blocked all roads into the estate.

This was not looting, but a return to a visceral desire to fight police that was first seen two days earlier in Tottenham.

There was an excited, frenzied mood. There appeared to be more older people and particularly more women taking part, many helping carry fuel debris for the fires.

Some rioters turned on people taking images on mobile phones. I saw one press photographer pulled to the ground and beaten with sticks.

It took police three hours to retake control of the estate. One telling incident occurred when youths started attacking a patrol car with bricks. It was only when the car reversed the crowd realised there was an officer inside.

Around 10 men instantly sprinted towards the car, pelting it with bricks and blocks of concrete. One tried frantically to open the car door.

Unable to see through his smashed windows, the officer accelerated his vehicle into the crowd, almost crashing into traffic lights. "I've been wanting to see us do this to the Feds for years," said one man, in his 30s, looking on.

I took shelter in a pub on the outskirts of the estate that – remarkably – was still open. The TV was showing helicopter images of a fire in Croydon, south London, where Trevor Ellis, 29, would be shot dead in the midst of the riots hours later.

That night I would see a rapid series of incidents that was almost impossible to compute. On Kingsland Road, groups of shopkeepers, many of them Turkish Kurds, sprinted past our car as they chased looters away.

An hour later, and further west, I was in Chalk Farm to see men armed with scaffold poles attack passing motorists and smash their way into shops.

When the windows were broken, people of all backgrounds surged in to help themselves to the free goods.

Khalili and I were pretending to be part of the crowd, with hoodies pulled tight over our heads. A man in a balaclava came up to me and gave us a hard, searching stare.

He walked away, and spoke to a friend who returned seconds later, asking us for a cigarette. We left soon after.

Later that night, as we headed to the scene of what was possibly the largest fire of the riots – at a Sony distribution centre near the M25 – we suspected we were being followed by a car with a smashed windscreen, forcing us to accelerate through a red light.

It was not until around 3am that we arrived at the west London suburb where Khalili lives: Ealing looked worse than anywhere else we had seen.

It was here that Richard Mannington Bowes, 68, was reportedly killed as he tried to put out a fire. There were parts of Ealing where every single shop had been attacked, and every car set on fire.

When we arrived the disturbances had died down, the streets almost empty.

I spoke to an eastern European builder who had just boarded up his friend's ransacked wine bar. He could not keep his eyes away from a burned out buggy in the middle of the road which reminded him of a war zone.

"Surreal is a good word I think for this," he said. "Hollywood does not know what can happen in real life." Like almost all the looting victims I spoke to, the builder asked: "Where were the police?"

The expectation that lawlessness would prompt communities to defend themselves in what could spill into vigilantism was well-founded.

The fear that it could turn into something far worse – racial conflict – did not transpire, despite pockets of far-right activity in parts of London. I saw one worrying development in Enfield on the fourth night, Tuesday.

As we drove north up Hertford Road, we came across more than 70 white males, in their 30s and 40s, running in unison down a street shouting "get the Pakis", "get the blacks".

They looked drunk, and people told us they had been chasing black teenagers. I reported the incident as a "minor skirmish", but my reports quickly became viral and, taken out of context, were being used to stoke fears of imminent racial conflict.

Worse, some took the report to be a misleading reference to a peaceful gathering of citizens who had come together to defend their community elsewhere in Enfield. It was a sobering reminder of the power of social media. The streets were in chaos, but so too was the internet, which was both the fastest source of reliable news and, unchecked, a means of spreading panic.

Tuesday turned out to be relatively quiet in London. I headed to Birmingham, to see yet more scenes of looted shops and torched cars.

Elsewhere, Manchester and Salford witnessed widespread looting, with shops attacked in Liverpool, Leicester, Bristol, Leeds and Nottingham, where a police station had been firebombed.

But the most tragic incident occurred in Birmingham, when three men guarding a petrol station – Haroon Jahan, 21, and brothers Shazad Ali, 30, and Abdul Musavir, 31 – were killed in an apparent hit-and-run incident.

Around 3am, as rumours circulated about their deaths, we began to receive reports of a major fire in Gloucester.

We arrived in the small city at dawn, to see there had been a riot there, too. The damage was not on the scale of bigger cities, but in places it appeared just as intense. I talked to Dale Millar, 26, who had spent the night photographing the riots. He described bins and bricks being hurled at police, adding: "I heard one little kid, 17, shout out 'I done my job today, I hit a police officer.'"

Four teenagers lingering nearby showed me BBM messages that had been calling on Gloucester to be attacked since Monday. One said: "Pussys stay at home! Bad man dnt come alone. Tell a fren to tell a fren!"

So why did the English riots of 2011 stop? Police chiefs will argue their strategy, which took three days to formulate, of flooding the streets with riot officers, proved a significant deterrence. The fact police numbers were bolstered by people determined to protect their own streets must also have had an impact, as did the rain.

But there was also a social pressure at work, and it came from the very same "culture" that David Cameron has blamed for the riots.

I spoke to parents who said they had persuaded their children to stay indoors, and young people who had held back their friends from taking part.

Even in the midst of the seeming immorality of rioting without a cause, there were signs of a moral compass, with young men trying to reign back others they felt were going too far.

In the early hours of Thursday, the first night of calm, I stood at what could have been a flashpoint: the Jet garage forecourt in Birmingham where three Asian men had died the previous day.

The fear that the deaths could trigger retribution against the local black community remained unspoken, but well-founded.

As soon as I arrived on Dudley Road I heard racist language used to describe the three men's killers. Around 300 Asian men – Sikhs and Muslims – had gathered, some in masks. I met Upinder Randhawa, who had spent the previous days using his tiny broadcaster, Sangat TV, to provide gripping live reports from the frontline of the disturbances.

Randhawa was talking hurriedly about shared religious values and the need for unity when a teenager in a mask barged in. "Fuck that man, I'm gonna get a gun and shoot somebody," he said.

But there were no guns and no shooting, in large part due to the debate that ensued after prayers. They decided collectively to abandon a planned march into the city, and avoid what many felt would be inevitable violence.

If Birmingham was on the brink that night, it was saved by the very same demographic that, elsewhere in the country, has been blamed for causing civil unrest. These were angry young men – many of them poor, second-generation immigrants.

Disorder could still break out, but whatever happens in England over the coming days, the debate on that petrol forecourt should serve as a hopeful reminder; of grieving young men who would show restraint in a time of crisis that some would say has eluded politicians, police chiefs and judges.

"We need to tell the media we will not tolerate the tyranny, but we will not react either," said Harpreet Singh, 28. "We are capable, but we will not do it."


View the original article here

Tory MP Louise Mensch backs up social network Blackouts during riots

Louise MenschTory MP Louise Mensch said, Rumors spread on the social-networks had wasted police time during the riots. Photograph: Rex Features

Louise Mensch, Conservative MP and one of Parliament's more active Twitter users have supported David Cameron's call for social networking services can be closed temporarily during civil disorder.

Mensch, MP for Corby and East Northamptonshire and a writer, used Twitter to call for a "short temporary closure" of Twitter and Facebook to stop the unfounded rumours spread, which she said had occurred in Northamptonshire last week during the riots, spread from London to several cities of England.

"Common Sense. If riot info and fears spread of Facebook and Twitter, extinguish them for an hour or two and then restore. The world will not implode, "she said.

On her Twitter feed, she added: " police Northamptonshire advise me that much of their time and resources were wasted answering false alarms due to soc media rumors. At the time, should tweeted people believe hard before you put the term ' rumors of ' in a Tweet. Nonsense rumors W'boro [Copenhagen] = 999 calls. "

"I don't have a problem with a short temporary closure of social media like a problem with a short road or rail closure does not have. If short, necessary and used only in emergencies, so what. We would all survive if Twitter will be closed by a short during major outbreaks of violence. "

Greater Manchester Police, however, supported the use of social networks, says they have allowed authorities to correct the rumors before the vessels.

Kevin Hoy, web manager at Greater Manchester Police, said Twitter allowed them to provide "direct insurance" and "dispel rumours … in a way that we never could have achieved in the past".

that Twitter had been "overwhelmingly positive" and "decisive" channel communications as violence spread throughout the region. It has invited its 95,000 twitter followers "name and shame" suspected rioters in CCTV images it has posted online.

Devon and Cornwall Police warned against a kneejerk reaction to claims, Facebook, Twitter and BlackBerry Messenger played a key role in organising disorder throughout the country.

A force spokesman said: "you have to deal with these things in proportion. To put someone's door in because of something they posted on Facebook is clearly not proportional, but talk to their parents and give them Advice is proportionate. It has the desired effect, and we stand by that. "

David Cameron said Thursday the intelligence services and police was explore whether it was "right and possible" to cut them "to plot violence, disorder and crime" on social networks. Home Secretary, Theresa may, is to hold talks with all major social networks about their responsibility in times of unrest.

All three social networks said they would welcome a meeting with may. Facebook said it had boosted its internal team to monitor potentially provocative messages and actively had removed several "credible threats of violence" from the site.

But there are questions about whether interrupt people is necessary, and whether it is technically possible.

Police throughout the country have arrested a number of people accused of organizing or encouraging violence on social networks.

Devon and Cornwall Police made their first arrest on Friday over comments posted by those who are suspected of fomenting violence on social networks. The force has given "words of advice" to eight people, all under 25, of messages posted online.

"If we know they encourage crime on the way, so that we know we can come across them on the media they use. I would suggest it works because either [inflammatory messages] have been taken or no disorder has come to them, "said the spokesman.

He said Facebook users had undertaken "show a sense of social responsibility" and report the inflammatory pages this week, resulting in them can be closed.

Current powers allow police to order cellphone companies to free up space on their networks, people try to call the emergency services. However, this is seen as a last resort.

O2 denied accusations that it turned off parts of its network in London during the unrest.


View the original article here